I've been following the recent developments around decriminalization of drugs (Marijuana mostly) with great interest. The counter intuitiveness of such measures is probably what makes it fascinating.
Anyway, the situation as of now - A few countries, mostly in Western Europe, are experimenting with legalizing the use of 'light' drugs like Marijuana.
In the Netherlands, producti

on, import , export and large scale dealing are prohibited and will still land you in jail. However, personal possession of Marijuana will result in only a fine, at the most. Laws are not usually enforced, and several 'Cannabis Coffee shops' have sprung up where you can smoke your favourite weed without fearing the law. The irony is that normal cigarettes are banned! Apparently Cannabis coffee shops have boosted tourism and netted an extra $500 million in taxes for the govt . As a result of decriminalization, drug use does not seem to have gone up significantly. See this
link for more details on the coffee shops
In Portugal, they decided to go all the way in 2001, completely legalizing possesion of
all drugs, including heroin and cocaine. If people are caught with drugs, they are offered therapy and rehab, not jail. Offenders can actually choose whether to take up that offer or not. Time Magazine has a
detailed article about this and its effects.
The paper, published by Cato in April, found that in the five years after personal possession was decriminalized, illegal drug use among teens in Portugal declined and rates of new HIV infections caused by sharing of dirty needles dropped, while the number of people seeking treatment for drug addiction more than doubled.
"Judging by every metric, decriminalization in Portugal has been a resounding success," says Glenn Greenwald, an attorney, author and fluent Portuguese speaker, who conducted the research. "It has enabled the Portuguese government to manage and control the drug problem far better than virtually every other Western country does."
Compared to the European Union and the U.S., Portugal's drug use numbers are impressive. Following decriminalization, Portugal had the lowest rate of lifetime marijuana use in people over 15 in the E.U.: 10%. The most comparable figure in America is in people over 12: 39.8%. Proportionally, more Americans have used cocaine than Portuguese have used marijuana.
(Note: the cited paper was published by the Cato Institute- a strongly left leaning think-tank, so a bias towards legalisation is possible)The major argument for legalizing drugs seems to be that prohibition has never been very effective. Prohibition usually leads to the banned trade going underground, leading to even more crime and violence. The liquor prohibition era in the U.S is a perfect example.
Incidentally, the U.S is seeing renewed debate over the possibilities of a softer drug regime. The U.S spends the most on fighting the narcotics trade, yet
sees higher usage than most countires. Liberal organisations have called for a review of govt policy and
some states are considering amending their laws.
Freakonomics had a
recent article or 'quorum of experts' which examines different sides of the issue..
Among the people who participated were
Robert Platshorn, a former marijuana smuggler, who says:
So for 29 years I lived in 11 prisons, costing you millions, as America’s longest-serving non-violent prisoner of the War on Weed. When Feds kicked in my door, I’d been retired from smuggling for two years. My ice cream and food concessions employed about 50 people. My Miami auto auction, body shop, and barbershop employed another 40. Good jobs and serious tax dollars — all gone in an instant.
What was accomplished? The War on Weed that started in the 1970’s discouraged pot smuggling by small timers like me, and filled the void with drug cartels far more interested in the lucrative cocaine trade. Big profits bred violence, enough to make Miami the U.S. murder capital. Today, we see that same prohibition-fueled violence along our Mexican border.
Legalizing marijuana would deprive this dangerous black market of profits and relieve a ridiculous burden on taxpayers; it would allow police to focus on serious crime instead of arresting more than 800,000 Americans every year for pot ...
So, based on lies and distortions, we demonized a plant that’s proven effective in treating chronic pain, glaucoma, MS, arthritis, and the effects of chemotherapy, AIDS-wasting syndrome, and other chronic illnesses. Studies in at least five countries have shown marijuana to slow and often reverse the growth of cancer cells. All this from a plant less toxic than aspirin and less habit-forming than coffee or wine.
Paul Armentano, Dy Director of the
National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) points out that
" Further, the great irony of our existing policy is that nearly half of all Americans — including our nation’s three most recently elected U.S. presidents — have used, and many continue to use, pot despite the imposition of prohibition. Would this percentage be even higher if marijuana were legalized? Possibly, but not likely. "
On the other hand, a former top ranking DEA (U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration) Official, Mike Braun, makes his case by presenting Alaska's experience with legal drugs
" In 1975, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that an adult’s possession of marijuana for personal consumption in the home was legal. Although the ruling applied only to persons 19 and over, teen consumption of the drug skyrocketed. A 1988 University of Alaska study found that the state’s 12- to 17-year-olds used marijuana at more than twice the national average for their age group. School equivalency test scores plummeted, as work place accidents, insurance rates and drugged-driving accidents went through the roof. Alaska’s residents voted to recriminalize possession of marijuana in 1990, demonstrating their belief that legalization and increased use was too high a price to pay."
Clearly, the debate is far from any signs of being resolved. The long term socio-economic impacts are not understood well. The same policy can produce different results in different countries and eras. The obvious political sensitivity of the issue makes objective assessments by governments very difficult...
But whatever the case, the time has come for the world to examine its long held positions and to tackle one of the biggest challenges of our times.
(I'll be updating this article very soon, with links to more sources and a look at actual figures..)